Tag Archives: Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore

Property cooling measures to remain

Real estate consultancy Savills says home prices would have gone up by an additional 9.2 per cent in 2012 over 2009 if not for the implementation of property cooling measures.

Demand for private homes in Singapore has been robust since 2009, pushing home prices to record high.

To curb price increase, the government has implemented seven rounds of property market cooling measures since September 2009.

Real estate consultancy Savills said home prices would have gone up by an additional 9.2 per cent in 2012 over 2009 if not for these measures.

Speaking at an industry seminar organised by the Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore, Savills said it is unlikely that policy makers would be removing any of the measures anytime soon.

Industry players said the government’s intervention has reined in asset price inflation.

Private home prices rose just one per cent in the second quarter of this year, on the back of a 16 per cent drop in sales volume.

Chia Boon Kuan, president of the Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore, said: “We are approaching an important inflexion point in the real estate cycle. Against this backdrop of increased market volatility and a maturing real estate cycle, prudence and a long-term perspective are essential for the health of the property market ecosystem.”

Mr Chia added that in a further sign of a stabilising market, HDB resale prices grew 0.5 per cent during April to June, the slowest rate since Q1 of 2009.

Looking ahead, Savills said home prices are likely to rise further as Singapore strives to accommodate an increase in population by 2030.

Alan Cheong, senior director of research and consultancy at Savills Singapore, said: “If you carry on with this series of measures – where the government would tap on the brakes and the same kind of regime goes on to 2030 – prices would still go up by 52 per cent, but that is over the next 18 years. On an annual compounded basis, it is about slightly over two per cent.”

Some analysts said the government should also re-look into policies to fast-track construction of new homes.

Ku Swee Yong, CEO of International Property Advisor, said: “We have been launching a lot of land but we have not been accelerating the completion of the properties. Similarly for HDB, we have launched so many BTO (Build-To-Order)  in the past few years. Each year is a record breaking year, but in terms of the pace of construction, buyers are still taking 40 to 48 months to collect their keys. That doesn’t match with the inflow of about 100,000 adults coming into Singapore every year in the last three years.”

Mr Ku said tweaking the government land sales programme could also put a lid on runaway home prices. He suggested that four to five sites be put on sale together with the same closing date or have an open auction system where bids are openly disclosed to interested developers.

Last year, the private sector invested S$12.6 billion in sites for development under the government land sales programme, up from S$10 billion in 2010 and S$12 billion in 2011.

Some analysts said there are other ways to re-channel the pent-up demand for properties in Singapore.

For example, property consultancy Savills said this includes developing alternative investment products linked to real estate or allowing the use of CPF savings to buy properties overseas, especially those built by accredited Singapore developers.

Source – CNA – 31 Jul 2013

Tweak prior cooling measures before imposing new ones

Those who were uncertain over whether the robust home sales by developers chalked up in recent months can be sustained have been left with no doubt following Tuesday’s release of April’s sales figures.

In all, a total of 2,487 new private homes – excluding executive condominiums (ECs) – were sold last month. This is a near 4-per-cent jump from March and is the highest monthly level since 2,772 units were sold in July 2009.

Initially, the doubters attributed the good performance to a few select projects with well-conceived developmental themes. However, the market has proven almost every property expert wrong. It had been all doom and gloom in the weeks following December’s cooling measures.

Today, the elevated monthly sales are being described by some as the new norm, although there is nothing normal as these robust numbers have been achieved on historically low borrowing rates.

Others are even suggesting that the volume of Government land sales may need to be reviewed and revised upwards if the current pace of sales is sustained. It was also not so long ago – slightly over a year – that the Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore (REDAS) suggested that the supply of state land be reduced as there were hints then that the market might be oversupplied.

This got me thinking: If so many of our private sector property experts got it so wrong, what of our counterparts in the public sector, especially those involved in advising the Government on the five sets of cooling measures introduced so far?

Could they have similarly misread and misunderstood the factors driving the private housing market? And if they did, surely it would be in the interest of the long-term stability of the private housing market that they review some the earlier cooling measures implemented, especially those that have not quite met their objectives.

At the moment, as I see it, some of the measures – especially those relating to stamp duties – are akin to slowly putting the private housing market into a straitjacket. In the near future, the market may find it hard to go forward or move backwards, to go up or to come down.

Already, we can see the distortions in the market created by some of these cooling measures. In general, all segments of the housing market should behave in the same way, in terms of price trends or volume of sales. After all, they all provide the same service – accommodation – and are substitutes.

Today, we see the volume of resale transactions shrinking while new sales boom. Prices of suburban homes move in opposite direction to those in the central areas. This is simply not normal.

And new apartment sizes are getting smaller and smaller. Shoebox units of 50 sq m (538 sq ft) or less bear the brunt of criticism but how many of us are aware that half of all new apartment sales today are for those below 75 sq m? And if more small units are being built, does it not mean that the supply of large or normal-sized apartments have been interrupted.

They have been lots of hints that the next set of cooling measures may target the shoebox unit.

But before we introduce another set of cooling measures, we should fine tune some of the earlier ones. As I see it, both the sellers’ and buyers’ stamp duty measures have more or less the same impact on the market. With the introduction of the additional buyers’ stamp duty, surely there can a case for the sellers’ stamp duty measure to be made less punitive.

If we keep adding on to the cooling measures – and my feeling is that there will be more to come as we have not quite addressed the liquidity problem – without a review of the earlier ones, there will come a time when the market will be caught in some kind of gridlock.

Colin Tan is head of research and consultancy at Chesterton Suntec International.

Source : Today – 18 May 2012