Tag Archives: MAs

Clouds clear for property developers

Barely a month ago, developers were still bogged down by worries that persistently strong property data could trigger more government measures to cool the housing market.

But now, these concerns seem to have dissipated quickly, with at least one research house upgrading its rating to “buy” for developer stocks and economists expecting the construction sector to continue its growth momentum after a surprisingly strong showing in the first three months of the year.

In a Monetary Authority of Singapore survey of private sector economists, which was released yesterday, the 21 economists revised upwards their median growth forecast for the construction sector for the full year by almost four-fold, from 1.7 per cent to 6.2 per cent.

The sector grew 7.7 per cent in the first quarter, much higher than the median estimate of 1.1 per cent in the previous survey in March.

DBS economist Irvin Seah said: “The growth came in as a huge surprise and the construction sector remains buoyant with a healthy pipeline of infrastructure projects and residential property developments.”

In a research note on Tuesday, Standard Chartered Equity Research analysts upgraded its rating for developer stocks “as policy overhang lifts, wages rise and nominal home prices hold up”. In particular, it upgraded its rating to “outperform” for CapitaLand and City Development.

CapitaLand shares closed 1.83 per cent down at S$2.68 while City Development shares closed 0.3 per cent higher at S$10.16 yesterday.

According to the StanChart analysts, about one in five developers here expect housing prices to rise going forward, compared to none in the first three months of the year.

They said: “Wages surprised on the upside last year by rising 6.4 per cent. Housing affordability improved in the year as residential prices only rose 6 per cent … We expect the Government to continue to drive income growth.”

They believe that no further cooling measures are on the cards.

“After five rounds of cooling measures, the private residential price index fell 0.1 per cent (in the first quarter) for the first time since 2009. Foreigners buying of private homes fell 78 per cent (in the first quarter). Public housing resale volumes and prices have also moderated,” the StanChart analysts said.

Property analysts TODAY spoke to agreed the Government’s cooling measures have taken hold and further sweeping measures are unlikely, given that property prices are softening.

IPA chief executive officer Ku Swee Yong said the broader risks of homebuyers overborrowing, people dipping into the market for a quick profit, as well as the problem of investors buying additional properties have been addressed.

“The measures have built a rather strong foundation,” he said. Major curbs are unlikely, although “very targeted” measures, such as to deal with shoebox apartments, could still be implemented, he added.

SLP International head of research Nicholas Mak added: “Speculation is down, price growth is down, and there’s a cautious investment climate because of the external economic outlook. If there are any more drastic measures, it could have unintended negative effects.”

Just last month, brokers were advising investors to avoid Singapore-focused residential developers.

But now, there is consensus among analysts that the removal of policy risks, a continued higher supply of land flowing into the market, as well as a healthy outlook on wages and employment could put some glean on developer stocks too.

Yesterday, the Ministry of National Development also announced it will supply 15 Confirmed List sites and 24 Reserve List sites in its Government Land Sales Programme for the second half of this year. This could yield 14,200 new private residential units.

HSR Property Group special adviser Donald Han predicted residential prices will show a downtrend in the flash estimate for the second quarter.

He also pointed out that developers’ bids for land this year have been at “reasonable levels”, which leaves room for profit in the next 12 months.

Source : Today – 2012 Jun 14

Singapore developers’ tactics over ABSD could lead to intervention

‘Marina Bay Suites’: developers, Cheung Kong, Hongkong and Keppel Land are offering ABSD returns to retailers.

In a move to surge Singapore’s property sales several developers are reimbursing the deterring additional buyer’s stamp duty (ABSD).

Imposed by the government in late 2011, ABSD was introduced to stifle Singapore’s residential property market.

Regulators’ eyebrows are now raised and may have to intervene in this new tactic deployed by developers to increase property sales, crippled by ABSD. Reimbursement of the stamp duty from developer to purchaser has caused concern over the possible distortion of property and loan values.

This latest strategy supersedes the common marketing gimmicks of furniture vouchers and discounts to defray ABSD.

A property consultant who did not wish to be named told Asia One: “The ABSD reimbursement is being made in this way so that it does not affect the pricing…which may upset their earlier buyers who did not get to enjoy the discount.”

He confirmed that a full reimbursement of the steepest ABSD rate of 10 per cent to foreigners purchasing residential property could amount to a significant discount that is not quantified in the Urban Redevelopment Authority’s (URA) records.

Wide scale returns of ABSD could sabotage the government’s policy to promote transparency in the market, according to industry assessors.

Sales caveats may not reflect the actual purchase price of the property as “discounts” are given only after a buyer has completed the transaction, in contrast to discounts which are accounted for into the reported transacted price.

In response to Business Times queries, the Ministry of National Development (MND) said: “As long as they do not distort prices, there is no need for the government to intervene against such business decisions and practices.

“We will therefore continue to monitor the market closely for now to ensure transparency.”

Developers, wholly or partially, reimbursing the ABSD include Cheung Kong (Holdings) Ltd, Far East Organisation, Allgreen Properties and Aspial Corporation’s World Class Land.

Projects involved range from high-end to mass-market developments. Cheung Kong, Hongkong Land and Keppel Land are jointly developing Marina Bay Suites in the Marina Bay area; Thomson Grand in Upper Thomson – a Cheung Kong project; an Allgreen project, Holland Residences in the Holland Road area.

Since the introduction of its reimbursement scheme in February, Cheung Kong has sold approximately 165 units at Thomson Grand; around ten per cent of sales were to foreigners. Units retailed between US$1,250-1,450 per square foot.

Marina Bay Suites’ management said: “more than 70 per cent of the units have been sold and we continue to sell our apartments through private previews and regional road shows, some of which were done in partnership with marketing agents.”

Keppel Land clarified that it does not offer ABSD reimbursements for its solo projects.

A spokesman from Property Enterprises Development (Singapore), Cheung Kong’s subsidiary said: “The reimbursement of ABSD will be payable to the purchasers upon the payment of the 20 per cent of the purchase price, the proof of the Certificate of Stamp Duty on the Agreement and the duly executed sales-and-purchase agreement.”

The Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore (REDAS) said: “it supports MND’s decision on fair and transparent practices which will enable homebuyers to make an informed decision.

In addition to price transparency the practice of ABSD reimbursement has raised concern over the distortion of loan value.

Ku Swee Yong, CEO of International Property Advisor said: “Buyers who take loans should declare the value of such incentives to the banks when they apply for the loan by giving the bankers the Offer to Purchase and all other side letters. Otherwise the loan-to-value ratios might exceed MAS’s limit.”

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) confirmed that when securing home loans, consumers should disclose to the bank any rebates or discounts received from the seller or any other party in the transaction. The bank will deduct any discount, rebate or any other benefit offered from the purchase price before calculating the loan amount, according to Asia One.