Category Archives: Property Market / Real Estate

Cooling resale market: Not time to boost demand

THE cooling demand for resale Housing Board flats has put some sellers in a quandary.

These sellers are those who have already got, or will soon get, their keys to newly completed Build-To-Order (BTO) flats or executive condominiums.

They have to sell their existing Housing Board (HDB) flats within six months of getting their new homes. But with buyers thin on the ground, some can’t find buyers within that time frame. So far, the HDB has been flexible and given them more time to sell their flats.

But how tenable is this situation, and should more be done?

Anecdotally, a handful of sellers are asking to collect their keys later, or for an extension of the deadline to sell their flats. These will give them more time to find a buyer for their unit.

The issue was raised by MP Lee Bee Wah on her Facebook page recently.

In the first half of this year, the HDB got 18 requests a month to delay the collection of keys.

But is this a matter of sellers holding out for high prices?

One expert thought so. “I think most HDB resale flat sellers are finding it difficult to sell their flat because the price that is offered is too low for their consideration,” says R’ST Research director Ong Kah Seng.

But some sellers have said there were no viewers, let alone offers, for their flats.

How did this situation come about, of people being unable to sell their flats to gain possession of a new one?

It’s partly due to government property cooling measures.

Soaring HDB resale prices caused unhappiness during the 2011 General Election. Since then, a flood of new flats has been built. Home loan curbs have lowered demand, meaning lower prices and fewer flats sold.

As of June, the Singapore Real Estate Exchange’s HDB resale price index has fallen by 6.8 per cent from its peak in April 2013.

Last month, 1,315 flats changed hands, down from 2011’s average of more than 2,000. In this weak market, the difficulty some BTO buyers face in disposing of their existing flats may be an unintended consequence, but is also an unsurprising one.

The Government arguably bears some responsibility for their plight. But what should it do?

If the problem is a lack of buyers, the obvious solution might be to boost demand.

One reader wrote to me with the suggestion that property curbs be eased on the resale market, so that the market can pick up again.

Another reader had a specific tweak in mind: Allow private property owners to buy resale HDB flats, as was the case until 2010. Current rules require them to give up their private home if they want a resale flat. If this is relaxed, they could form a pool of ready buyers, said the reader.

But when posed this question by The Straits Times, some property experts dismissed this idea.

Any attempt to boost demand has wide-ranging effects, as this very problem demonstrates. The point of cooling measures was to reduce demand and bring prices down. Raising demand would risk raising prices again.

More to the point, it would be a very blunt solution for what is essentially a niche problem.

Most new flat owners don’t have an existing HDB flat to sell. Only “second-timers” do and they are a minority of BTO buyers. They form no more than 30 per cent of those buying two- and three-room flats, and 15 per cent for larger flats in non-mature estates.

For mature estates, a mere 5 per cent of the BTO supply is reserved for them. Of these, only a tiny number has problems disposing of the existing flat.

The 18 requests for delayed key collection each month in the first half of this year is a smaller proportion of all keys handed over than the 11 requests a month in the second half of last year.

Over the last one year, such requests represent less than 1 per cent of all flats to be handed over.

Mr Ong adds: “It may be better to grant such sellers a longer period to dispose of their flat, instead of introducing new types of buyers for resale flats, which might affect the dynamics and pricing equilibrium that the recent cooling measures have painstakingly hoped to better.”

The HDB has essentially been doing this, by considering and often granting deadline extensions. This may not seem like a long-term solution. But in the context of an ever-changing property market, it might well suffice.

OrangeTee head of research Christine Li thinks that HDB resale transaction volumes could bottom out this year.

Admittedly, things could also worsen. This year will see over 28,000 completed BTO flats and 17,000 private residential units.

This could mean a flood of people trying to offload their flats, making it harder to do so.

If the situation indeed worsens and more needs to be done, then targeted measures may be needed. For now, it is worth waiting to see if changing market conditions can do the trick.

Sharp rise in private home purchases in Q2

Here’s a possible reason why the authorities are not inclined to remove any property cooling measures just yet: There was an across-the-board increase in caveats lodged for private home purchases in the second quarter compared to the previous quarter.

DTZ’s analysis of URA Realis caveats database shows a 37.1 per cent quarter-on-quarter increase in the total number of private homes transacted to 3,369 units in Q2.

A segmental breakdown showed that the number of units picked up in the resale market climbed nearly 41 per cent or 386 units to 1,328 units in Q2 from 942 units in Q1 – ending three consecutive quarters of decline.

New sales by developers too rose by 511 units or 36.8 per cent to 1,898 units. In the subsale market, 143 units changed hands in Q2, up 11.7 per cent from Q1.

Resales refer to transactions of completed properties. Subsales refer to secondary market deals involving uncompleted properties.

Across buyer segments, too, there were increases. Singaporeans, PRs and foreigners all bought more homes in Q2 than they did in Q1.

Purchases by Singaporeans rose nearly 45 per cent quarter-on-quarter to 2,491 units in Q2. The number of private homes picked up by Singapore permanent residents climbed 24 per cent to 574 units, while purchases by non-PR foreigners rose 2 per cent to 260 units.

Those with HDB addresses bought 1,629 units in Q2, up 41.3 per cent from Q1. The number of private homes acquired by those with private addresses climbed 33.4 per cent to 1,740 units.

Despite the recovery in Q2, the 5,826 total private homes sold in the first-half of this year is not even half the 13,651 units transacted in the first-half last year – reflecting the dent on transactions created by the Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR) framework since its introduction in late-June 2013, notes Lee Lay Keng, regional head (SEA), research at DTZ.

Still the pick-up in the Q2 caveats would give the policy makers a reason to pause and reflect, amid calls by developers and other parties urging the authorities to start rolling back cooling measures such as the additional buyer’s stamp duty and the seller’s stamp duty, she added.

Most industry watchers accept that TDSR is here to stay for the long term. Under the framework, banks granting new property loans to individuals have to ensure a borrower’s total monthly debt obligations (including car loan and credit card repayments) do not exceed 60 per cent of gross monthly income.

“The reason caveats have recovered in Q2,” said Savills Singapore research head Alan Cheong, “is that demand is extremely price elastic or price sensitive. Even a slight price decline would lure many potential buyers back to the market”.

“In 2012 and 2013, the market was fixated with new property launches. In 2014, the genuine upgraders and even investors who are not overwrought by new-fangled small-format homes have started to look at the resale market where more habitable, larger apartments are to be found, and they have started to plunge into the market.

“And the sellers of such properties being individuals, unlike developers, have little bargaining power and acceded to the buyer’s price offers. Hence, prices in the resale market have gone down.”

DTZ’s Ms Lee said the strong new home sales in Q2 was amid an increase in launches by developers.

“Based on preliminary monthly numbers, developers launched 2,843 private homes in Q2, compared with 1,964 units launched in Q1. Big projects were released in Q2 in good locations and at attractive prices – such as Commonwealth Towers, Lakeville, Coco Palms and The Sorrento – resulting in relatively good sales,” said Ms Lee.

“Moreover, some previously launched projects saw renewed interest after new units were released at lower prices in Q2. For instance, the developers of The Panorama and Sky Habitat sold another 149 units and 153 units, respectively in Q2 after median prices were reduced by 10-15 per cent since these developments were first launched in Q1 2014 and Q2 2012, respectively.”

DTZ’s caveats analysis also showed that because Singaporeans’ share of private home purchases rose at a faster clip in Q2 compared with the more modest increases in buying by PRs and foreigners, the proportion of units bought by Singaporeans rose four percentage points quarter-on-quarter to 74 per cent.

Conversely, PRs saw a two percentage point retreat in their share to 17 per cent in Q2. Foreigners too posted a three percentage point fall in their share to 8 per cent.

Another finding is that 58 per cent of private homes picked up by Singaporeans in Q2 were new sales by developers. Among foreigners, the figure was 62 per cent. For PRs, however, it was a roughly equal split of the source of units between new sales and resales. Of the 574 units PRs acquired in the second quarter, 47 per cent comprised new sales, and 46 per cent resales, with the balance 7 per cent involving subsale transactions.

“It appears that a higher proportion of PRs are buying for owner occupation and hence want a completed property they can move into immediately,” suggests Ms Lee.