Tag Archives: Singapore Property Market

Are the days of the shoebox unit numbered?

When I first raised my concerns about the proliferation of shoebox homes with a Ministry of National Development official in an informal meeting early last year, he wanted justifications for action and a size definition of what constituted a shoebox unit.

Today, I am not sure if the official has finally got “satisfactory answers” to his questions but recent events hint that the days of the shoebox unit may be numbered.

In its latest release of quarterly real estate data, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) – for the first time in a very long while – included its own analysis of private apartments sold by size and price categories.

The URA figures show that 27 per cent of the 6,526 units sold by developers in the first quarter, including 68 completed units, comprised small units of 50 sq m or below, up sharply from 15 per cent in the previous quarter.

Units costing up to S$750,000 made up 42 per cent of developers’ Q1 sales, up from 25 per cent in Q4 and the highest since the 52 per cent registered in Q1 2009, when property buying fervour recovered after the global financial crisis.

Earlier news reports have shown that the bulk of small apartment buyers have HDB addresses. The evidence becomes even more damning after the National University of Singapore released its flash estimates of its Singapore Residential Price Index (SRPI) for March early this week.

The sub-index for completed apartments of about 500 sq ft and smaller led the rebound in resale prices by 2.8 per cent. In February, prices of shoebox apartments had fallen by 0.8 per cent. Prices of apartments in Central region also rose by 0.8 per cent in March, which was a rebound from the 2-per-cent decline in February. Prices of homes In Non-Central region climbed 0.7 per cent against a 1.2-per-cent decline for the previous month.

Most analysts will agree that the resale market has generally underperformed the market for new units sold at project launches. It is reasonable, then, to expect that the price performance of new units is likely to be the same or better.

In the March data, all the sub-indices of the SRPI point in the same direction – in this case, all rises – something that has not happened for some time. This consistency indicates that buying confidence has returned to the market and that’s usually the prelude for a price increase. And it looks very likely that small apartments or shoebox units will lead the charge.

Finally, in what must be the clearest hint yet, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan said on Wednesday the Government was keeping an eye on the proliferation of ‘shoebox’ units of 500 sq ft or less offered by private developers. If the proportion of such units becomes too high in the market, ‘we may have to step in’, he warned.

It has been more than a year since shoebox apartments began making the headlines. There have been numerous arguments against them as well as industry analyses providing ample evidence that such units have been leading the price charge as well as the robust sales.

Yet despite warnings that the rental yield for such units may not be as rosy in the future as they are today or that the market is already oversupplied with such units, the market continues to snap them up, simply because they are affordable.

But I can understand these buyers. Even Marc Faber, the famed “Dr Doom”, when he was in town recently, said: “One is better off holding shares and properties than government bonds or cash” even as he predicted that global markets are ripe for a deep correction over the next six months. Presumably he feels, like most buyers today, that property tends to hold its value better than other assets in a correction.

Dr Faber foresees a 20 per cent correction in global markets. Will property prices be hit? For sure, the same factors that will lead to a sharp correction in global stock markets will also affect property – more in some markets and less in others. How will Singapore fare?

By Colin Tan – head of research and consultancy at Chesterton Suntec International.

Source : Today – 4 May 2012

Prices of private residential properties register marginal decline in 1st quarter 2012

The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) released today the real estate statistics for 1st Quarter 2012.

Prices of private residential properties fell marginally by 0.1% in 1st Quarter 2012, compared with the 0.2% increase in the previous quarter. This was the first quarterly fall in prices since 2nd Quarter 2009, following nine consecutive quarters of declining price increases.

Prices of non-landed properties in Core Central Region (CCR)1 and Rest of Central Region (RCR) both fell by 0.6% in 1st Quarter 2012, compared with the 0.5% and 0.1% respective increase in the previous quarter. For Outside Central Region (OCR), prices increased by 1.1% in 1st Quarter 2012, compared with an increase of 0.6% in the previous quarter.

Rentals of private residential properties registered a lower rate of increase compared to the previous quarter. Rentals increased by 0.3% in 1st Quarter 2012, less than the 0.4% increase in the previous quarter. The rate of increase in rentals has been moderating for three consecutive quarters, since 3Q2011.

New Launches

A total of 6,903 uncompleted private residential units were launched for sale by developers in 1st Quarter 2012, compared with 4,105 units in 4th Quarter 2011.

6,458 uncompleted private residential units were sold by developers in 1st Quarter 2012, compared with 3,525 units in 4th Quarter 2011. Take-up of shoe-box units (i.e. smaller than 50 sqm) accounted for 27% (or 1,764 units) of new sales in the quarter.

Lower-priced units less than $750,000 accounted for 42% (or 2,766 units) of new sales in 1Q2012, much higher than the 25% (or 911 units) seen last quarter. Overall, many of these units are located in the suburbs, as 82% of the new units sold by developers were from OCR in 1Q2012.