Tag Archives: Property Bubble

ING raises UK bubble fears

No underlying fundamentals for sector’s performance

ING Real Estate has raised concerns that a recent rise in UK commercial property prices could lead to a bubble, possibly causing values to fall again by end-2010, one of its senior executives said on Tuesday.

‘The size of that downturn will depend on the actual rate of the capital appreciation that we see now . . . if it’s too big, you could create a bubble,’ Kevin Aitchison, CEO of ING Real Estate Investment Management UK told Reuters in an interview.

The view echoed other major property investors who warned this month that Britain’s commercial property market recovery could be short-lived, if prices rise too quickly without growth in the economy and rental rates.

UK values rose 1.1 per cent in September, as they started to recover from a two-year downturn that saw valuations plunge 45 per cent, the benchmark Investment Property Databank (IPD) index showed last month.

ING Real Estate, one of the world’s largest property investors with a portfolio of 100 billion euros (S$208 billion), estimates actual UK market prices to have risen up to 23 per cent so far this year, however, due to huge investor demand.

‘At the moment, investor demand is huge but because the occupier side continues to deteriorate, the underlying fundamentals for property performance actually aren’t there,’ Mr Aitchison said on the sidelines of an ING Real Estate seminar.

He remains bullish about the long-term prospects for UK commercial property and sees the next three to five years as a positive time for UK assets as the occupier market recovers and rents start rising in 2011.

The company still has equity of between £200 million (S$462.9 million) and £300 million available for UK real estate, but is in no hurry to invest the money right now, due to continued risks in the market, Mr Aitchison said.

‘We are treading with caution. We will certainly try to invest that amount of money but it has got to be the right stock,’ he said, adding that weak occupier demand also makes this a bad time to invest in the development of new projects.

ING prefers UK real estate sectors such as retail properties like shopping centres and retail warehouses, and multi-tenanted industrial estates, in particular focusing on assets on long leases.

It is focused mainly on raising a UK property fund in partnership with private equity firm Hamilton Bradshaw, and does not have imminent new fund launches in the UK, Mr Aitchison said.

‘We’re always conscious of the fact that we still have cash for existing clients, and we need to make sure that we’re not raising money for the sake of it,’ he said.

Asked about the impact of an imminent split of ING Real Estate’s parent, the Dutch bancassurer ING Group, Mr Aitchison said that it ‘will be business as usual’.

ING Group is selling its worldwide insurance operations over the next four years as part of a restructuring ordered by the European Commission.

‘Even if we were real estate on its own, or part of insurance – real estate is one of the biggest managers in the world, insurance is fifth or sixth biggest in the world – so we will remain part of a substantial business,’ Mr Aitchison said.

Source : Business Times – 12 Nov 2009

Singapore Property : This for developers and their customers

NO PROPERTY bubble shall be tolerated. This bald assertion went down like a splash of cold water on the fast heating market when, in September, the Government stopped home loans on easy terms and chose not to extend concessionary support for developers upon its scheduled expiry next year. These concessions were granted in the last Budget. Speculative demand did slow as a result of these moves, but price levels were still too high for comfort. Developers were pushing their luck cashing in after a fallow period.

Last week came an early announcement that land sales targeted at mass market buyers, including parcels for executive condominiums, will be available for bids early next year. Land releases have a gestation period between tender and launch, but the depressant effect on sentiment is immediate. The market understands that, like nothing else. This undoubtedly was the intention of the National Development Ministry, as the consensus among government trend trackers is that the variable economic recovery is hard to chart. It makes sense that asset price inflation associated with unjustified market exuberance has to be checked.

Within days, the Monetary Authority of Singapore reinforced the message with a prominent warning on real estate activity in its year-end Financial Stability Review. It cited risks covering the opposing contingencies of a faltering economic recovery leading to property portfolio devaluations, and a sustained recovery leading inevitably to higher interest rates, which would be trouble for the over-leveraged and the illiquid. The central bank’s concern about macro stability is naturally holistic, seeing what adverse impact unrestrained stock and property bets in a period of unstable growth can have on the soundness of the banking system. Household debt shall not grow onerous, it is saying by extension.

Banks’ lending capacity must remain unimpeded so as to keep the economy oiled. It would be compromised if the rebound falters and brings in its train business failures, job losses and the ultimate danger of soured loans forcing banks to be again stringent with credit. The MAS bottom line (developers should prick their ears up here) is that further intervention in the property market would be necessary if ’speculative momentum’ re-emerged.

Buying activity and price levels for the rest of the year and up till the next Budget is presented will tell if the industry and its customers see the inherent risks of acting too hastily on the rebound. It took Hong Kong a dozen years for property values to right themselves. But stable growth never stood a chance in that archetypal monetised enclave. Its government is now desperately acting to head off a bubble forming.

Source : Straits Times – 11 Nov 2009