Tag Archives: Property Agents

Property rules should protect not just clients but agents too

I REFER to Monday’s report, ‘Surge in complaints from home buyers’.

Much has been said about a need for a regulatory body for estate agents to protect buyers and sellers from rogue agents, and understandably so.

However, when Ms Xie Ruzhen states that she felt she had been duped into signing an agreement requiring her to pay her agent a 1 per cent commission when the industry’s standard commission guideline for the seller’s agent is a 2 per cent commission (particularly for HDB), something has gone amiss.

How was she duped into signing a contract that allowed her to shortchange her agent of his commission by half? She also said she had intended to pay only a 0.5 per cent commission after having recently forked out a 2 per cent commission to the agent for his service in selling her previous flat.

Does she feel that since she had already paid him a fair commission previously, she now had the right to pay him less?

As an agent who plays by the rules and am always open and honest with my clients, like many of my fellow agents, I am appalled by the actions of less ethical counterparts who have given our industry a bad name. However, this does not give parties like Ms Xie the right to undermine our worth and the services we provide. My advice to home sellers and buyers is, if you do not think your agent is worth his commission, then he is not the agent for you.

The market rate is 1 to 2 per cent commission, so if you cannot even bring yourself to pay your agent the minimum 1 per cent, then find another agent you feel is worth his commission. After all, there is no shortage of agents.

Medalina Barber (Ms)

Source : Straits Times – 25 Sep 2009

Surge in complaints from home buyers

THE upbeat property market has led to a surge in the number of real estate-related complaints from home hunters.

The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) said the number of such complaints  it received started to surge from May.

It has received 619 complaints in the first eight months of the year, of which 89 cases and 107 cases were lodged in July and last month respectively.

The bulk of the complaints relate to HDB flat transactions, said Case executive director Seah Seng  Choon.

The Singapore Accredited Estate Agencies (SAEA) said it  received 141 public inquiries, feedback and complaints in July and last month,  which is more than what it would typically get in a full year. This compares with just 26 cases in the first half of this year.

Another six complaints have poured in during the first two weeks of this month.

About 40 per cent of the 141 cases comprise complaints against property agents or disputes on commission payments, and so on, said SAEA chief executive Tan Tee Khoon. Continue reading