Tag Archives: HDB News

New PR limits may hit Indian flat sellers

Mr Mohamed Mustafa Shahulhamid has been looking for a resale flat in Little India for his son in the last six months.

So far, his hunt has been fruitless.

‘Many Indian families want to live in Little India. No Indian families are moving out and we cannot buy from the Chinese,’ said the 51-year-old frozen food trader.

Under the Ethnic Integration Policy, the Government has set ratios for ethnic groups in HDB blocks and precincts. This is to prevent enclaves from forming.

In Little India, the quotas for Indians/Others are usually filled.

But Mr Mohamed Mustafa may now get a break as a result of quota changes. On March 5, the quotas for Indians/Others were raised to 12 per cent and 15 per cent for precinct and block respectively, up from 10 per cent and 13 per cent.

The corresponding quotas remain unchanged for the Chinese (84 per cent and 87 per cent) and Malays (22 per cent and 25 per cent).

Is this change a boon for Indian buyers and sellers?

It is unclear at this point, said estate agents, because another quota has also come into play.

On March 5, the HDB also announced quotas for permanent residents (PRs), set at 5 per cent and 8 per cent for precinct and block respectively.

Previously, an Indian seller could also rely on PRs to make up for any shortfall in potential Indian buyers, if the Chinese and Malay quotas had been reached in a block or precinct.

But with the PR quotas, the pool of buyers could become smaller, said Mr R. Subra, managing director of SKV International Property Consultants.

‘The new limits for PRs may nullify any upside from the ethnic quota change,’ he noted.

Already, Indians are selling their homes at a few thousand dollars – or up to 10 per cent – below the average transacted prices of a similar flat type in the same neighbourhood, said Dennis Wee Group agent Jason Sim.

This is true of areas like Sembawang and Woodlands, where the Chinese quotas are maxed out, he said.

Take the case of retiree K. Omar, who had Chinese buyers offering up to $25,000 cash over valuation for his four-room flat in Bukit Ho Swee. But they could not close the deal because the Chinese quota in his block had already been met.

Mr Omar, 65, took a year before he sold the flat at the valuation price of $430,000 last November. The buyers were a Vietnamese couple.

But the revised Indian/Others quotas offer potentially good news for Indians eyeing areas such as Race Course Road.

One reason such places are popular is that they are near temples.

In these districts, Indians have often found it hard to buy a resale flat because the quotas were already filled, and not many Indians or Eurasians wanted to sell their homes in the first place.

Industry experts said the effects of the new changes will be seen only in a couple of months.

For now, the search for a flat continues for Mr Mohamed Mustafa.

‘The raised quota may not help,’ he said, adding that he may consider areas like Toa Payoh, Thomson and Paya Lebar.

Source : Sunday Times – 14 Mar 2010

HDB started checks after getting tip-off

IT ALL started with a tip-off to the Housing Board (HDB): A four-room flat in Bukit Batok was being rented out illegally.

Further checks confirmed that the flat – bought by Mr Poh Boon Kay and his wife Khoo Kim Cheng in June 2007 – had been sublet without the HDB’s prior approval to three Myanmar couples at a monthly rent of $1,900.

Mr Poh, a housing agent, and his family did not live in the flat.

They were told to evict the sub-tenants immediately on Nov 25 last year, failing which the board would take possession of the flat.

But the sub-tenants did not go.

On Dec 23, the HDB sent Mr Poh a notice to say it would take back his flat.

But Mr Poh, 61, claimed his tenants had agreed in writing to vacate the flat by the end of December.

The next day, he and his wife appealed against the HDB’s move. They said they intended to sell the flat to one of the tenants, who needed to sort out his finances.

The HDB then interviewed the couple on Jan 5 this year, during which they claimed they did not know that they needed prior approval to sublet the flat.

They also claimed that they were not aware of the minimum occupation period (MOP) of three years before they were allowed to sublet the flat.

But further HDB investigations showed that Mr Poh was connected with two other cases of unauthorised subletting of flats belonging to his relatives in Bukit Batok and Telok Blangah.

The flat in Bukit Batok belonged to his aunt, aged 91, and had been sublet to Myanmar monks since July last year for a monthly rent of $1,400.

The monks used it as a meditation centre, and the rent was paid to Mr Poh, who acted as his aunt’s housing agent.

The Telok Blangah flat, meanwhile, was owned by his daughter.

It had been rented out for $900 monthly since May.

Checks with neighbours confirmed that Mr Poh’s daughter was not living there.

Both flats were also sublet without obtaining the HDB’s prior consent, and the board said that it would be taking steps to acquire them compulsorily.

In a statement yesterday, the HDB said that the additional cases of illegal subletting by Mr Poh showed that his claims of being unaware of the HDB’s rules cannot be substantiated.

‘These regulations are publicly available from many sources,’ it said, adding that ‘there is clear evidence that Mr Poh, a housing agent by profession, has been intentionally abusing HDB flats for monetary gains’.

It concluded: ‘As he has blatantly flouted HDB’s rules, there are no grounds for leniency.’

See Also : Illegal subletting: HDB to repossess man’s flats

Source : Straits Times – 13 Mar 2010