Tag Archives: Govt Policy

Property measures: Keep them guessing

IF THERE was a party in the property market going on after the Chinese New Year, the Government would have been the party pooper. Barely a week into the new year, it introduced measures to cool the febrile-prone property market. A new seller’s stamp duty was introduced, together with a reduction in the loan-to-value limit for home loans, from 90 per cent to 80 per cent. The measures came just five months after the Government implemented moves to kill innovative interest absorption home loan schemes.

For property prices to go up is patently reasonable. After all, the property market is now seeing ample liquidity, low interest rates and growing consumer confidence buoyed by a recovering economy. That said, however, the speed at which the market is heating up is puzzling. In January, property developers sold 1,476 units – a figure treble that of the preceding month. Prices have increased at a faster rate compared to rebounds from the troughs of previous property cycles. Mortgage lending has also increased steadily by about 12 per cent year-on-year through the whole of last year. Market watchers can only surmise that the strong demand could be coming from either pent-up demand or buyers flush with cash from collective sales.

Typically, official measures to cool the market are inevitably late, given that they occur after the fact. But thankfully, they do not come so late as to fail to pre-empt any speculative bubble. In essence, the Government is doing what it has been adept at doing – precision targeting to put a brake on speculative demand before it spirals out of control. The stamp duty will hit short-term speculators, while the bank loan limit will affect buyers at the margins.

The most powerful weapon in the Government market-cooling arsenal, however, is not the series of measures already announced, but those yet to be. This is one of the oldest tricks in the book, be it in fields as diverse as nuclear strategy, politics or an endeavour as earthy as property: to receive pain in one big dose is bad; to get the same pain in small but discrete instalments is worse, but to have no certainty as to when the dose will come is the worst. As one industry watcher noted, if the Government can enact the measures so fast and without warning, it can do something ‘faster and more painful’ if prices continue to head north. Here, in essence, is the nub of the Government’s pre-emptive strategy that will keep property developers and speculators awake at night: keep them guessing.

Source : Straits Times – 26 Feb 2010

Govt to increase development charge rate for residential homes in S’pore

The government has increased the development charge rate for both non-landed and landed residential homes. Analysts said this is in line with the strong rebound in home sales and prices over the last six months.

The rise in non-landed residential DC rates, in particular, is expected to add on to developers’ land banking cost.

Private homes were hot property in 2009. Some 6,300 units have been sold in the last six months.

And market watchers said the upward revision in development charge for residential homes is widely expected.

A development charge is the tax payable by the developer when a property site is developed into more valuable project.

This allows the government to have a share of the gains from the enhanced value.

The DC Rate for non-landed home will go up by eight per cent on average with prime areas like Orchard Road, Sentosa and Cantonment seeing double-digit increase.

The DC rates for suburban locations like Paya Lebar, Eunos, Bedok North and Tampines also went up .

Some observers said the upward revision could have a marginal impact on developers’ land banking plans.

Dr Chua Yang Liang, head of Research, Southeast Asia, Jones Lang LaSalle, said: “The DC rate revision will have some bearing on potential developers looking at en bloc deal especially those which have an increase in plot ratio, it might have some effect.”

DC rates for landed residential homes will also go up by an average 12 per cent.

The largest increase of 17 per cent will apply to developments in Sentosa, Tanglin and Holland and even Hougang, Toa Payoh and Ang Mo Kio.

In contrast, the levy for commercial sites will fall by two per cent on average.

Sites in Raffles Quay and Shenton way will see a 13 per cent reduction.

Sentosa is the only sector in the Commercial category to see an uptick in DC rate by 12.5 per cent.

Mr Chua believes the opening of the Integrated Resort and its retail spaces has put an upward pressure to close the gap between sectors like Sentosa and World Trade Center where Vivocity is located.

With this revision, the gap has narrowed from S$1,750 to S$1,400.

Some said this reduction could have an unintended effect.

Dr Chua added: “If you look at DC rate between residential and commercial, residential continues to rise in the downtown areas, whereas the office market, office use, continue to contract.

This means there will be a wider gap between these two land use groups suggesting redevelopment into office use rather then conversion into residential.”

The change in DC rate will take effect from March 1 and will last for six months.

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 26 Feb 2010