Tag Archives: Central Provident Fund

Bring back rental flats in big way

May I suggest that the Government consider restoring the HDB rental system in a big way. During the early days of this nation, this was how many Singaporeans were adequately housed when they were resettled from kampungs. One-, two- and three-room Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats were rented out to those who could not buy.

Why is it that these smaller flats were subsequently either perceived by the HDB as lacking a demand, or was it a matter of policy? What is wrong with living in a small flat even on rental if it means affordability and having more disposable income for other uses?

The Japanese people are known to live in “rabbit hutches”, as a former Prime Minister of theirs said. But still they can make their small living environment nice and liveable.

In any case, HDB flats on purchase have a 99-year lease. Owners are really lessees only, according to the HDB agreement.

If the monthly rental of a three-room HDB flat is only half the amount needed for purchase – say S$500 instead of a S$1,000 monthly instalment – one can save S$500 in cash or in CPF which ensures a bigger nest egg for retirement. One can also use the savings to invest in low-risk types of investment like international government bonds with a return starting from 4 per cent annually.

Under the current situation, much of the CPF savings of a HDB lessee can be used up in paying for a new HDB flat whose value may start depreciating 50 years into the lease – which, incidentally, would be at the point of one’s retirement age.

And one’s HDB flat cannot be easily liquidated as cash for use because one will always need housing. Indeed, the Government has proposed that an eligible lessee sell it back to the HDB for a monthly payment that can be used for living expenditures in his/her old age.

The Government should seriously consider restoring the rental system for HDB flats. This is on top of the urgent need to quickly build more flats to house new families.

Letter from Chia Hern Keng

Source : Today – 17 May 2011

Resale options for ageing condos

For private property owners, the 60-year mark is considered a major milestone — they could either watch their properties depreciate in value or opt for a collective sale.

Although banks are generally reluctant to lend to owners of older properties, things are not as bad as they seem since there are still some banks that are flexible with mortgages on older properties, and there is the Central Provident Fund (CPF) that can accommodate purchasers eyeing mature properties.

Last month, the plight of owners of ageing properties made the headlines, as the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) rejected the application of The Arcadia condo for a lease top-up despite obtaining 100 percent support from the owners.

SLA’s decision has also turned the spotlight on other ageing condos like Lutheran Towers, One Tree Hill Mansions and Hollandswood Court.

Meanwhile, The Peace Centre and Peace Mansions complex, which has 58 years left in its lease period, has been released into the en bloc sale market, but other properties like Hillcrest Arcadia have resisted that option.

While collective sales became the main option for owners to unlock their home value, experts said there are other ways to curtail the value of homes.

Mr. Ong Kah Seng, Senior Manager of Asia-Pacific Research at Cushman & Wakefield, said owners who want to preserve their home should keep it in good condition, especially when it has historic features that boost its value and make it good for preservation.

He noted that there are still other options to resale the property even if a lease top-up request is denied, just make sure the property is well maintained and the amenities and infrastructure are well enhanced.

“Owners of some aged prime developments may be able to expect better buying interest from purchasers who are cash-rich and do not require home loans,” he said.

Mr. Colin Tan, Research and Consultancy Director at Chesterton Suntec International, said owner-occupiers are typically less concerned about leases.

“When the green movement gets stronger, we might also see fewer en blocs. Instead of tearing down older buildings, which is blatant wastage, they can be refurbished like in other countries,” he said.

In an interview with The Straits Times, Mr. Tan said that banks can also help out. Despite their reluctance to fund older properties, some factors like the borrower’s profile, tenor of the loan and the property’s location are also taken into consideration.

Ms. Lui Su Kian, Managing Director and Head of Deposits and Secured Lending at DBS, said that while most banks do not finance homes with less than 30 years left on the leasehold period, applications are reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Source : PropertyGuru – 16 May 2011