Tag Archives: CEA

Third unregistered salesperson sentenced this year

Lim Beng Kwang (48 years old, Singaporean male) was sentenced to a fine of $6,000 for holding himself out as a salesperson without being registered with the Council for Estate Agencies (CEA), an offence under the Estate Agents Act. Another count of his doing estate agency business without a licence was taken into consideration.

About the Case
CEA uncovered Lim’s offences when it investigated a complaint made against him for rude and unprofessional service. In January to April 2011, Lim had advertised several HDB flats for rental on an online property portal under his name, using a mobile number which was loaned to him by an Australian friend.

Lim had wanted to help a flat owner rent out a room in the owner’s flat in return for commission payment but was found out by CEA and prosecuted before he could successfully do so. Lim was found conducting a HDB flat viewing on behalf of the owner and he sought to interest some potential tenants to rent the room. He marketed the room to the potential tenants and discussed with them the rental and commission to be paid.

Lim is the third unregistered salesperson to be sentenced under the Act this year. CEA will be prosecuting several more persons for doing estate agency work without being registered over the next few months.

Advice for Consumers
Property owners who intend to rent out their properties are advised to check CEA’s Public Register of Estate Agents and Salespersons at http://www.cea.gov.sg for the identity and registration number of the salesperson whom they are engaging. As Lim was not registered, his record would not be found if a search was done on the Public Register using his mobile number.

Consumers should only engage salespersons who are registered with CEA. They are advised to request for the salesperson’s registration number, and verify that the salesperson is listed on CEA’s Public Register before engaging his or her services. The Public Register has been enhanced to allow consumers to search the particulars of a salesperson, using the salesperson’s mobile number. This is in addition to search options using the salesperson’s name or registration number.

Consumers are also advised not to respond to any real estate agency flyer, leaflet or advertisement that does not provide a salesperson’s details or registration number.

Consumers should report to CEA when they encounter any person not listed on the Public Register but carrying out estate agency work illegally. They can report the person to the CEA at 1800-6432555 or feedback@cea.gov.sg.

Source : CEA 2012 Jun 22

Building laws need larger scope

I read with interest the report “‘Proxy wars’ in condos” (June 11).

As many Singaporeans now reside in strata title homes, including those hived off from public housing, it is timely that the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) is reviewing the Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act. This should include enlarging the scope of duties carried out by the Strata Titles Board.

For a start, it should hear cases between management councils and developers, besides hearing only cases between residents and councils.

This would free the courts for major cases that would develop the legal fraternity and Singapore as an arbitration hub, rather than be constrained by such domestic issues.

Before a development is allowed, architects are required to seek approval from the BCA. In turn, it requires the building plans to be submitted to the Fire Safety Bureau, the sewerage and drainage departments and other authorities for approval of aspects of building design of which the BCA is not the sole authority.

As the coordinating body for the final approval of building works, it could thus intervene to get sub-standard works rectified before a Temporary Occupation Permit is issued.

If ancillary works, such as swimming pools, tennis and squash courts, car park wash bays, gymnasiums and playgrounds could be sanctioned, then arbitration, if any, would be kept to a minimum.

Ancillary works that are often defective are found mostly in common areas that do not require the BCA’s approval. This is where home owners are at the short end of the stick.

Management councils now use the maintenance fund to obtain legal redress against developers that provide these sub-standard works.

This could be made unnecessary by requiring developers to obtain approval for ancillary works, too.

It is time-consuming, costly and not right to use maintenance funds to seek legal redress.

from Gilbert Tan Hee Khian

Source : Today – 2012 Jun 18