Growing Hunger For Business Trust

Comments on Straits Times Article Growing Hunger For Business Trust

An article just came out today on Straits Times which I find quite interesting. Many people are drawn to the high dividend yields of business trusts like REITs, but don’t seem to understand the structure well. The article provides some basics of business trust as well as the difference between a REIT and a business trust.

One of the main differences between a business trust and a REIT is that REITs can only hold real estate assets while a business trust can hold pretty much any asset, including real estate and under development properties. REITs can only borrow up to 35% without a credit rating and maximum up to 60% with a credit rating while trusts do not have any leverage caps.

REITs are also required to pay out 90% of earnings and do not have to pay taxes on profits while there are no such requirements and benefits for business trusts. As a result, I am not keen to invest in Ascendas India and Perennial Retail China Trust as they are both structured as trusts rather than REITs. I prefer to have more certainty in the dividend distributions and no taxation ensures more value flows to the investor.

For those of you who follow my posts, you would know that I have sold the only trust I own in my portfolio due to lack of proactive management and acquisition of new assets. Unlike REITs, each business trust operates in a different sector and it is important to understand the sector well before investing. For example, I know many investors who got burnt by the shipping trusts as dividends dropped since IPO due to the poor performance of the shipping industry.

Since business trusts are valued mainly based on their ability to provide dividend, the most important valuation method would be dividend discount model (DDM). So if dividends drop, the stock price would definitely drop, leading to a double whammy. It is important to understand how the trusts generate their cash flows and whether it is stable in the long run and sustainable. I would highly recommend against investing in sectors which are cyclical, like the shipping industry unless you understand the sector very well and want to engage in market timing.

Another key consideration in business trusts is the life of the assets. Unlike real estate, most of the assets in trusts have a fixed usable lifespan, such as ships, incinerators etc. As such, depreciation tends to be very high and it is important to take note of the age of these assets as their income producing ability tends to decrease as they are near to end of life. There has to be a balance between capital expenditure and depreciation to ensure they are not just aging the fleet without replacing them to drive up cash flows.

Source : MakingPassiveIncome – 2012 Jun 17

Building laws need larger scope

I read with interest the report “‘Proxy wars’ in condos” (June 11).

As many Singaporeans now reside in strata title homes, including those hived off from public housing, it is timely that the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) is reviewing the Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act. This should include enlarging the scope of duties carried out by the Strata Titles Board.

For a start, it should hear cases between management councils and developers, besides hearing only cases between residents and councils.

This would free the courts for major cases that would develop the legal fraternity and Singapore as an arbitration hub, rather than be constrained by such domestic issues.

Before a development is allowed, architects are required to seek approval from the BCA. In turn, it requires the building plans to be submitted to the Fire Safety Bureau, the sewerage and drainage departments and other authorities for approval of aspects of building design of which the BCA is not the sole authority.

As the coordinating body for the final approval of building works, it could thus intervene to get sub-standard works rectified before a Temporary Occupation Permit is issued.

If ancillary works, such as swimming pools, tennis and squash courts, car park wash bays, gymnasiums and playgrounds could be sanctioned, then arbitration, if any, would be kept to a minimum.

Ancillary works that are often defective are found mostly in common areas that do not require the BCA’s approval. This is where home owners are at the short end of the stick.

Management councils now use the maintenance fund to obtain legal redress against developers that provide these sub-standard works.

This could be made unnecessary by requiring developers to obtain approval for ancillary works, too.

It is time-consuming, costly and not right to use maintenance funds to seek legal redress.

from Gilbert Tan Hee Khian

Source : Today – 2012 Jun 18