Profit slump for some agencies

The profits of some of Singapore’s biggest property agencies have nose-dived by as much as 20 to 50 percent due to weak transaction volumes in the private housing market following several rounds of cooling measures, according to media reports.

As a result, more than half of Singapore’s 1,425 registered agencies could suffer losses, revealed some top names at these agencies. Moreover, many of their agents failed to clinch any sales, or became inactive last year.

“I would not be surprised that many small and mid-size agencies and even the larger agencies, if they are not nimble enough, will face challenges and many will end up in losses,” said PropNex CEO Mohamed Ismail.

Although the firm’s sales in the residential market only declined by three percent this year, profits saw a larger drop of 20 percent as overall transaction value fell alongside property prices.

ERA Realty’s Chief Executive Jack Chua also admitted that profits of major agencies have fallen by 20 to 50 percent.

In 2013, net profit for its agency business ERA Realty Network slumped by 43.5 percent to $10.4 million given the 12 percent drop in sales, based on filings submitted to the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA).

As for HSR, it suffered a net loss of $5.42 million in 2013 from a net profit of $3.45 million in the previous year, according to documents submitted to the regulatory watchdog.

However, the situation could get worse. Developers’ sales, which make up about 66 percent of all private non-landed transactions, declined to 4,409 units in H1 2014. This means the year-end total will be a far cry from the 14,948 units seen last year and the 22,197 units in 2012.

Records from the Council for Estate Agencies (CEA) shows 67 licensed property agencies closed their doors last year with 1,425 agencies still remaining as of 1 January 2014.

Govt still studying reverse mortgage scheme

The Ministry of National Development (MND) is studying several countries that have established reverse mortgage plans, revealed National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan and reported in the media.

He made the statement in Parliament in response to a query from Nee Soon GRC MP Lee Bee Wah.

“We are studying several countries with established reverse mortgage plans, and to learn from their experiences,” he said.

Notably, a reverse mortgage is a “loan taken up by a property owner using his property as collateral. However, unlike a traditional mortgage, the borrower need not make cash repayment during the loan tenure. He only needs to repay the loan with accumulated interest upon termination or death, typically from the sales proceeds”, said Mr Khaw.

This allows the property owner to unlock some equity, while still retaining the financial upside from any appreciation in property value, he added.

But the Minister noted that the reverse mortgage scheme also has its risks since it does not require periodic cash payments such that the loan grows with interest, and the owner has to bear property risks.

“If the market value of the property becomes less than the outstanding loan, the owner may have to sell the property to repay the loan.”

He also pointed out the NTUC Income offered reverse mortgages for HDB flats in 2006, but decided to stop offering the product due to low take-up (only 24 households signed up).

In fact, the countries being studied also posted low take-up rates for the product.

“As the reverse mortgage is a complex financial product, we need to study it carefully, consult our people, before we decide whether to introduce it as an additional option for our seniors.”