Category Archives: Property Market / Real Estate

CBD living set to pick up momentum

LIVING in the bustling Central Business District has caught on, with plenty of property launches in the area in recent years.

Many people love the convenience of being just five minutes from work, but some have grumbled at a lack of amenities. There are no schools, supermarkets and shopping centres in close proximity, they say.

But this is set to change with more mixed developments in the pipeline, experts say.

Take, for instance, GuocoLand’s 1.7 million sq ft mixed-use development, Tanjong Pagar Centre.

It will boast a tower of Grade A office space, 181 luxury serviced apartments called Clermont Residence and shops. The project will be linked to the 202-room Clermont Singapore hotel.

So far, 14 out of 54 units launched have been sold, at an average price of $3,055 per sq ft (psf).

Over at Marina Bay, all eyes are on the 3.67 million sq ft integrated project Marina One, jointly developed by Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund Temasek Holdings and its Malaysian counterpart Khazanah Nasional.

The 1,042-unit project is expected to go on the market in the second half of the year, priced at about $2,800 psf to $3,000 psf.

“Investors who buy small units can expect keen leasing interest from mid- to senior-level expats who might be on limited housing allowances but still want a conveniently located property,” said Mr Ong Kah Seng, director of R’ST Research.

Other new developments launched include the 202-unit 76 Shenton, which has moved units at an average price of $1,959 psf, according to data from Square Foot Research.

The 280-unit Altez in Enggor Street has sold 229 units, at an average price of $2,390 psf, while 215 homes have been snapped up at the 360-unit Skysuites@Anson for $2,603 psf on average.

Units were sold at a median price of $2,618 psf at new launches in the five months to May, rising from a median price of $2,303 psf in the same period a year ago, according to HSR Research.

This boom in downtown living has its roots back in 1995, when the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) singled out the lack of a residential population as the business district’s key weakness, noted DTZ’s research head Lee Lay Keng.

The URA then set about introducing city living to the area.

After that, the first residential projects completed were the 646-unit Icon by Far East Organization, which obtained its Temporary Occupation Permit in 2007; and the 168-unit Lumiere, which was completed in 2010.

Resale prices of units at these older projects have held steady, noted Mr Ong, staying flat in the past year.

“Resale prices were able to hold in 2013 due to strong leasing demand, although rents are moderating,” he said.

“Most investors feel that there is a ready pool of tenants, despite more competition than before.

At Icon, 91 leases were secured at a monthly median rent of $6.69 psf in the first quarter, while Lumiere had 17 leases at a monthly median rent of $5.90 psf.

Rental yields in the area are about 4 to 4.5 per cent, well up on the islandwide rental yields of 3.8 per cent, added Mr Ong.

“In the longer term, as plans for the Southern Waterfront City under the 2013 Masterplan are implemented, we expect that this will add further impetus to the rejuvenation of the Tanjong Pagar area,” said Ms Lee.

“As the current CBD is extended towards Tanjong Pagar, this will help to support rental and capital values in the area.”

Source : STProperty

Unsold homes big drag on developers’ coffers

DEVELOPERS have collectively paid up to $55.1 million in extension fees for unsold units in their private condo projects since 2012. They could potentially fork out another $80.7 million to extend the sales period for another year if they do not sell their inventory by year-end, according to a study by OrangeTee Research.

“As the penalty amounts to millions of dollars per project, we believe that it will incentivise some developers to reprice some of these projects to move sales in the near term,” said OrangeTee research head Christine Li.

A total of 24 condo projects, mostly high-end ones, are still not fully sold two years after receiving their temporary occupation permits (TOPs) between 2010 and 2012, the study showed. Under the government’s Qualifying Certificate (QC) rules, developers have to pay extension charges to extend the sales period after two years of the project’s TOP.

All developers with non-Singaporean shareholders or directors need to obtain QCs to buy private land for new projects because they are deemed “foreign developers” under the Residential Property Act (RPA). This means the QC rules apply to all listed developers. Privately owned Far East Organization and Hoi Hup are among the few developers exempted from the rules.

Given that the QCs allow developers up to five years to finish building a project and two more years to sell all the units, the heat is on developers to clear their stock by the deadline.

To extend the sales period, developers pay 8 per cent of the land purchase price for the first year of extension, 16 per cent for the second year and 24 per cent from the third year onwards. The charges are pro-rated based on unsold units over the total units in the project.

Such fees drove luxury residential player SC Global to delist from the Singapore Exchange last year after sales slowed significantly due to the government’s property cooling measures.

Analysts warn that more extension charges will kick in. The charges paid up so far are just the tip of the iceberg as projects built from land acquired during the 2006-2007 en bloc fever have just crossed a seven-year mark, they say.

“More developers are caught between a rock and a hard place” as they have to decide whether to pay the extension charges or cut prices to move the units, said SLP International executive director Nicholas Mak.

If they pay for extension charges, there is also the question of whether they can recover these costs later on, he said. This is why some developers of luxury projects are resorting to selling the units in bulk to mega investors.

OrangeTee’s study of the 24 projects excluded three projects whose land costs could not be determined. It tracked sales of projects through caveats lodged, which it conceded could be lower than actual sales.

At the end of the first quarter of this year, there were 10,295 unsold units in the Core Central Region (CCR), 8,089 in the Rest of Central Region (RCR) and 12,433 in the Outside Central Region (OCR).

Based on URA caveats, there are 71 unsold units in Wheelock Properties’ Scotts Square that TOP-ed in 2011 and 16 unsold units in Wing Tai’s Helios Residences, which also TOP-ed in the same year.

“As unsold inventory builds up, there will likely be more bargains in the market if developers want to avoid paying penalties to extend the sales period, especially high-end developers who have already paid premium prices for their lands,” Ms Li said.

The study excluded the fees that developers need to pay to extend the completion of projects beyond five years, as they can typically extend without paying the charges “based on technicalities”.

Even in a more optimistic scenario where developers manage to sell 20 per cent of the remaining units for the rest of this year, further extension charges to be paid by developers by end-2014 will amount to around $68.3 million.

Some market watchers noted that the QC rules should mark a distinction between larger and smaller projects, given that it takes a longer time to move all the units in large projects in a difficult market as the current one.

Century21 chief executive officer Ku Swee Yong said that demand for high-end projects had been hit hardest by higher additional buyers’ stamp duty (ABSD) since January 2013 and a borrowing cap under the total debt servicing ratio (TDSR) since June last year.

Even if a developer decides to set up an investment company to buy the units and rent them out, the company could be hit by a 15 per cent ABSD and is restricted by a loan-to-value limit of 20 per cent.

While there is good reason for having QC rules to regulate foreign participation in the housing market, these rules were in place before the ABSD and TDSR. “It is about time we review these measures,” Mr Ku said.

Source : STProperty