Category Archives: Luxury Property

Ultra-luxurious homes of Sentosa Cove

Home to well-known people like celebrity hairstylist Addy Lee and City Harvest Church pastor Kong Hee, Sentosa Cove is a quiet and serene enclave, exuding luxury and exclusivity. Residences at Sentosa Cove are the only ones in Singapore where owners can berth their yachts in their own backyard.

Sentosa Cove at a glance

Total land area 117 ha (equivalent to 145 football fields)

Leasehold: 99 years

Number of homes

By 2014, 2,160 homes, comprising a mix of ocean-front villas, waterway bungalows, hillside mansions, terraces and condominiums, are expected to be completed.

The North Cove has been fully developed. In the South Cove, another 34 landed units are expected to be built.

In addition, two new condominiums – Seven Palms and The Pinnacle – are under construction and slated for completion in two years.

Number of residents: About 4,500.

Profile of homebuyers

From January last year to the present – 48 per cent are Singaporeans or permanent residents, down from 64.1 per cent, who bought between 2005 and 2007.

– 48 per cent are foreigners, up from 25.3 per cent from 2005 to 2007.

– 3.9 per cent are companies, down from 10.4 per cent from 2005 to 2007. Yacht owners

15 per cent of waterway households own yachts which are berthed in their backyards. Some residents also berth their boats at ONE°15 Marina Club.

How much per sq ft?

Landed property: $2,134.50 as of Q1 this year, up from $1,574.56 in 2009.

Non-landed property: $2,418.33 as of Q1 this year, up from $1,691.09 in 2009.

Most expensive landed property sold

What: A 16,000 sq ft detached house on Cove Drive. It is said to have five bedrooms and an entertainment room.

When: February

How much: $39 million .

Who: Previously owned by Citi Private Bank chairman Deepak Sharma and his surgeon wife, Dr Susan Lim. It was sold to Mr Shael Oswal, a 33-year-old Indian mining mogul.

Most expensive non-landed property ever sold

What: A unit at Turquoise Condominium

How much: Sold for $18 million

When: December 2007

In the first three months of this year, only five units changed hands. Last year, 79 units changed hands, down from 203 units in 2010 and 169 units in 2009.

Source : Stomp – 2012 Jul 7

20120707-225018.jpg

20120707-225013.jpg

20120707-225004.jpg

20120707-224959.jpg

20120707-224952.jpg

20120707-224946.jpg

20120707-224940.jpg

20120707-224933.jpg

20120707-224927.jpg

20120707-224921.jpg

20120707-224916.jpg

20120707-224911.jpg

20120707-224903.jpg

20120707-224852.jpg

20120707-224838.jpg

High Court says investors must pay for condo units

The High Court rejected a request made by a group of ARA investors to suspend the payments for 10 apartments they purchased at the luxury Grange Infinite condominium.

The case had been brought to court last year, with investors claiming the units they bought were not as elegant and luxurious as promised by Grange Properties.

The High Court has given investors until Saturday to pay the outstanding repayment bill of S$10.18 million. Failure to do so will annul the sale and give Grange the right to repossess all the units.

In total, ARA investors purchased 53 units for S$388 million, 16 of which have since been resold.

ARA was issued with a 21-day notice on April 9 by Grange with respect to the 10 units. The notice warned investors that their failure to pay up by the deadline would give Grange the right to resell the properties.

However, the investors filed an injunction on 24 April, hoping that the payments would be “suspended, deferred and/or postponed until the disposal of the suit”.

They claimed that they suffered losses of close to S$46.1 million, which included costs for the repair of building defects.

ARA argued that Grange may transfer the money from resold units, leaving it unable to pay damages that could be awarded to them.

Grange contended that the argument was inconsistent with ARA’s allegation that it lost potential tenants and buyers because the units were poorly built and thus difficult to sell.

It is now “considering its position in relation to the outstanding amounts for the other units purchased” by the investors.