Category Archives: General

Blueprint to boost interior design sector

Trade group lays out plans to raise standards in the industry

Interior design is not just about running after contractors or drawing layouts – and an association believes it is time to hammer out higher standards for the industry here.

‘I probably didn’t draw a living room for 20 years,’ says Nicholas Merrow-Smith, client manager at Davenport Campbell (Singapore) who became president of the Interior Design Confederation Singapore (IDCS) in April.

And he wants to show that interior designers can do more. IDCS hopes to raise the level of innovation in the industry and has several suggestions on how this can be done.

Among its initiatives are an accreditation scheme for interior designers, a professional development programme and more collaborations with foreign design firms or other design disciplines.

The proposals have won the support of some practitioners in the wider design industry. Singapore Institute of Architects president Ashvinkumar Kantilal is one who thinks that IDCS is heading in the right direction.

‘The (interior design) industry needs to self-regulate and widen the members’ knowledge base,’ he says, suggesting skills upgrading programmes in the form of courses and seminars.

Financially, the interior design industry is in fine shape, with plenty of work. But according to Mr Merrow-Smith, it lacks creativity and diversity, and this is especially clear when it is seen against its foreign counterparts.

He cites an example – interior design firms here tend to focus on traditional real estate, while those overseas can be multi-disciplinary, even taking on projects such as theatre design.

And interior designers abroad are going into research, he adds. For example, there are studies on how the design of office space can get employees to buy into their companies’ values.

‘What we’re trying to do is to show people that the design portfolio is much wider,’ says Mr Merrow-Smith. And if design firms raise their standards, there is also a chance for them to secure better work, he adds.

IDCS is kicking off its efforts with a conference this month, called Design Value: Beyond the Tangible, to highlight how design can be a strategic tool.

It will be attended by players from global firms such as Gensler and Hassell, who will share their experience of how workplace and leisure space designs can influence people’s performance and behaviour.

In the longer term, IDCS will try to facilitate partnerships between interior design outfits and other design industries such as architecture.

DP Architects director Tai Lee Siang trusts that greater collaboration among the various design sectors will help strengthen the Singapore brand of design.

IDCS also hopes to set up a professional development programme by the middle of next year. With the course, interior designers can undergo continual training and conduct industry-related research.

The next – and tougher – step would be to establish an accreditation programme for interior design firms. There is no such assessment system in place now. ‘Some firms do very good work, but it’s certainly not across the board,’ Mr Merrow-Smith says.

Some interior design firms see benefits from accreditation. The group managing director of Nota Group, Ong Sheng Keat, reckons: ‘In Singapore, a large proportion of the market is dominated by business-minded contractors or decorators who see the profession as another form of trade mainly due to the lack of enforced certification’.

Altered Interior director Thierryson Chua also supports accreditation for firms in the industry, but believes a scheme could be more effective if the government was involved. If IDCS oversees the scheme, it will have to be ’super active’ in organising events and attracting members, he says.

IDCS could not disclose its membership size because an auditing session is under way. But Nota Group’s Mr Ong says IDCS has been seen as exclusive and inclusive – ‘exclusive in the sense that it only admits genuine practising interior design professionals as members, yet inclusive because it will attempt to convert the non-professionals’.

IDCS is aware of the hurdles to implementing its plans and it is getting help from the government. For instance, it has secured funding capped at $435,000 over three years.

The association also spoke to representatives from about 50 interior design firms and related companies. According to Mr Merrow-Smith, they are supportive of its initiatives.

‘We don’t expect the whole industry to step up,’ he says. But ‘we’d like to see a core body of people who are serious about pushing the envelope, innovating, and doing things differently’.

Source : Business Times – 19 Nov 2009

Stiffer rules for green buildings

THE building industry has been set more stringent standards for indoor air quality and ventilation which will hopefully reduce health problems among occupants and also increase energy efficiency.

Senior Parliamentary Secretary (Environment and Water Resources) Amy Khor announced two new standards yesterday at a conference on energy and sustainable-development benchmarks, which is part of the Singapore International Energy Week.

One of the new standards, called SS 554, is a benchmark for indoor air quality – for instance, how humid a building should be as well as how much dust and soot should be in the indoor air.

The maximum allowable humidity level is now 65 per cent, down from the previous 70 per cent, to reduce the growth of bacteria and mould.

And the new limit on the allowable concentration of particulate matter is 50 parts per billion (ppb), down from 150 ppb in previous rules.

A second set of guidelines, SS 553, was also laid down for energy efficiency in ventilation and air-conditioning systems, which, according to Spring Singapore, account for more than 60 per cent of a building’s energy consumption.

With the new energy standard, businesses will be cutting their energy consumption by 10 per cent to 30 per cent, said a Spring spokesman.

The new standards kick in immediately and are part of the Building and Construction Authority’s Green Mark sustainable-building scheme, which aims to make more buildings here environmentally friendly. The authority’s goal is to mark 80 per cent of all buildings as green by 2030.

Developer City Developments welcomed the new standards. ‘As a green developer and responsible landlord, CDL is committed to providing quality indoor environmental and service standards in an eco-friendly way for our tenants,’ its spokesman said. CDL is a Green Mark Champion, chalking up 11 Green Mark awards this year.

The energy-efficiency and environmental standards are part of Singapore’s sustainable development blueprint, the Government’s plan released in April on how to build and grow the city in an environmentally friendly way.

Spring, the national standards and accreditation body, also announced yesterday that it would be developing energy-efficiency requirements for how electric vehicles are recharged, how data centres with their banks of computer servers are run, and other energy-related industries.

Spring and the Energy Market Authority (EMA) are coming up with standards for some types of solar-power systems, said EMA’s deputy chief executive David Tan at the same conference.

These standards are expected to be ready by next year, Mr Tan said, and would ensure the systems are installed and operated safely.

EMA has also put out a handbook on installing solar photovoltaic systems, targeted at contractors, electricians, property owners and other laymen.

Solar energy is the most promising renewable-energy source in Singapore, Mr Tan added, with 1MW of solar photovoltaic capacity already installed and another 4MW in the pipeline.

Source : Straits Times – 18 Nov 2009