Monthly Archives: March 2010

Charity commissioner questions City Harvest

It seeks clarifications over megachurch’s $310m stake in Suntec

City Harvest Church is now a co-owner of Suntec Singapore, and has said it will use two floors in Suntec to house a 12,000-seat auditorium for worship services. — ST PHOTO: ALPHONSUS CHERN

THE Commissioner of Charities has questioned City Harvest Church (CHC) about its $310 million stake in Suntec Singapore.

The 33,000-strong megachurch announced two weeks ago that it had become a co-owner of the downtown commercial property, which houses a convention and exhibition centre.

The complex’s full name is Suntec Singapore International Convention and Exhibition Centre.

The money spent includes renovation and rental costs, the church said. CHC has not created a separate business entity for the purchase of the property.

But in the wake of the announcement, questions surfaced among the public about whether religious organisations – which are registered as charities – should be allowed to go into business using what are essentially donor funds.

Some asked if the income collected by CHC through rentals at Suntec would be taxed.

Questions were also raised about whether the church’s plans to use two floors in Suntec for worship services would amount to a change of use of commercial properties.

When The Straits Times posed these questions to the Commissioner of Charities, he said he was not in a position to comment at the moment as his office is ’seeking clarifications from CHC on this business venture’.

However, a letter jointly issued by the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) and the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore provided some answers.

The letter was a response to Straits Times reader Lester Lam, who wrote to the Forum page and questioned the relevance of giving religious organisations tax-exempt status when several such groups own commercial properties and collect rental income.

The government bodies responded that incomes earned by charities are tax-exempt because their main purpose is to provide public benefits through their activities.

They acknowledged that some charities have chosen to engage in business activities to generate additional income, but said such business activities ‘must be done in the best interest of the charity and not subject the charity’s assets and resources to unacceptable risk’.

Charities contacted said that the decision on what is an ‘acceptable risk’ is left to their boards. They said investment decisions are made internally, and that they are reflected in their accounts, which are subject to audit.

The joint letter went on to say that any business carried out by a charity under a separate legal entity is subject to the normal corporate income tax.

It added that the ‘exclusive use of commercial developments for religious purposes would constitute a material change of use of such developments into places of worship’.

Doing so requires a proposal to be submitted to the URA. URA said no such proposal has been received from CHC.

The church, which had said earlier that it would use two floors in Suntec to house a 12,000-seat auditorium for worship services, could not be reached for comment last night.

During the March 6 service, senior pastor Kong Hee said that the auditorium would be used exclusively for its services, except under certain circumstances.

He said then that it would move out about five times a year to allow for international conferences or events to be held there.

The church has spent the past five years looking for a suitable plot of land, said Dr Kong, who founded it in 1989 as a small Bible study group of 20.

The Suntec purchase came after it looked at tens of other properties, including the Lion City Hotel in Tanjong Katong and Iluma in Bras Basah Road, but rejected them as they were considered unsuitable due to their small size or likely traffic congestion.

Source : Straits Times – 20 Mar 2010

Singapore Housing Loan Packages – March 2010

* All rates are corrected as at 16 Mar 2010
** All rates quoted are indicative only, and subject to change without any prior notice
*** All rates indicated are to be used as a guide only.  Further confirmation with the respective banks is required.

PDF Version Latest Housing Loan Packages – March 2010

Effective 20th February 2010, the Singapore Government has introduced the following anti-speculative measures to deflate and allay the increasing pressure of a property bubble forming.

1.       Introducing a Seller’s Stamp Duty (SSD) on all residential properties and residential lands that are bought after the abovementioned date and sold within 1 year from the date of purchase; and

2.       Lowering the Loan-to-Value (LTV) limit to 80% for all housing loans provided by financial institutions regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)

Following the withdrawal of deferred payment and interest only scheme, the resilient residential property market continued to push for new heights in terms of both prices and volume in expectation of imminent economic recovery, exuberance due to the opening of the two integrated resorts, low borrowing costs and high liquidity in the market, and most importantly, the increase in our population over the years.

With these two measures, the Government is taking a pre-emptive step to reduce the number of speculative transactions. Those who plan to flip private residential properties may have to review their strategy taking into account the increase in price needed to make this profitable bearing in mind the cost of SSD. Lower loan to valuation (LTV) bank financing will keep marginal buyers and speculators at bay. This will likely bring cheer to buyers of resale flats as they are likely to be greeted with more choices and stronger bargaining power in order to lower the cash over valuation.

The Government is concerned with the overheating of property market as it appears to be moving ahead of signs of sustainable recovery. Should the actual recovery fall short of expectation, the property buyers and speculators alike will have to face financial losses. In addition, strong demand for funds may increase cost of borrowing which will seriously impact those who are over-stretched with loan installment payments.  To make matters worse, the financial system could be threatened if the property bubble bursts and the progress of economic recovery derailed.

After the announcement, the expectation is for buyers of private residential property to shun away from the market and stay at the sidelines watching the reaction of the sellers with the hope of catching a bargain. Without maximum LTV of 90%, buyers will likely have lesser competitors, and sellers less offers.  Consequently, if a property is bought at 3% to 5% discounted price, the impact of SSD on buyers who intend to flip will be minimal.

From the response of 1st new major mass market project launched following the press release by MDA, units at The Estuary were going for around $750 psf as buyers seemed undeterred by these measures. These buyers have demonstrated their financial means of at least 20% commitment in their purchases and also the willingness to hold the property for at least 1 year.

Supported by the strong sales from The Laurels in Cairnhill road, The Vision at West Coast and Coralis at Joo Chiat road over the weekend, further enhanced the point that our property market is stil HOT!

What’s the cause of such phenomenon?  Is the project priced to sell? Are these buyers buying ahead of Government’s next deterrence? Or are prices going to go up further in view of the demand due to improving economy and growing population?

But now the question is – When is hot too HOT!