Monthly Archives: March 2010

Retirement housing land lease to be studied

DEVELOPERS here already have the option to build retirement housing villages on any site that is zoned for residential use.

But the Government will study a suggestion by Nominated MP Laurence Wee that those interested in developing such villages be given the option of 60-year land leases – or 30-year leases that can be extended for a further 30-year period.

Senior Minister of State for National Development Grace Fu informed Mr Wee that the Urban Redevelopment Authority had, in fact, already made a Jalan Jurong Kechil site available for sale on a short tenure of 30 years.

‘The developer has the flexibility to develop the site for retirement housing or conventional housing development. The shorter tenure of 30 years allowed for the site was intended to reduce the land costs, which could facilitate retirement housing development,’ she said.

Ms Fu made the point that not only was the option of residential zones already available, but the developers could also build developments targeted at niche markets like the elderly. She said the Housing Board also built studio apartments that are custom-built for elderly living.

Mr Wee had envisaged a development of low-rise condominiums which offers elderly folk a means to live with peers, while staying socially involved to combat loneliness and depression.

Property developer and former Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore chief Daniel Teo, 67, said the Government was ‘moving in the right direction’.

He too is keen on developing a retirement village and agreed that longer leases would be more attractive.

He explained that higher building costs and the benefits of economies of scale might mean that having a longer lease would serve a developer better.

Source : Straits Times – 5 Mar 2010

Untrustworthy? Not property agents…

I REFER to last Friday’s report, ‘In firefighters we trust (but not property agents)’, which placed property agents as least trustworthy.

The online poll of 760 people conducted by Reader’s Digest magazine is inconclusive.

The Public Perception & Expectations of Real Estate Agents survey conducted by Ngee Ann Polytechnic, involving 1,041 respondents and reported in the media two months ago, revealed that 81 per cent engaged property agents in their real estate transactions.

Of the total number of respondents, 68 per cent were tertiary-educated (diploma to postgraduate qualifications). From these figures, it can be deduced that well-educated consumers trust property agents enough to appoint them in their real estate transactions.

Unlike any consumer or insurance product, the purchase of a property may cost millions of dollars and often involve the consumer’s life savings. Yet 843 people in the Ngee Ann Polytechnic survey enlisted the assistance of property agents in their real estate transactions.

This would appear inconceivable if property agents were the least trustworthy. In fact, of the remaining 19 per cent of respondents who did not use estate agents, less than 20 per cent of this group attributed their decision to ‘lack of trust’.

That means fewer than 40 people out of 1,041 respondents actually said they did not trust property agents.

Moreover, 65 per cent of respondents were satisfied with their estate agents’ services and 67 per cent rated them between ’satisfactory’ and ‘excellent’ in the key attribute of Fiduciary, which referred to confidence and trust in an ethical relationship.

While the estate agency profession has not been adequately regulated, we do not agree that this is tantamount to being least trustworthy. The recent negative publicity of rogue estate agents is an exception and does not reflect the majority who value professionalism and integrity. We will all do well not to lean towards over-generalisation.

Dr Tan Tee Khoon
Chief Executive Officer
Singapore Accredited Estate Agencies

Source : Straits Times – 5 Mar 2010