Monthly Archives: July 2009

Some S’pore-listed REITS maintained or raised payouts

DESPITE the economic recession weighing on the property market, some Singapore-listed real estate investment trusts (Reit) that posted their results yesterday maintained or raised their payouts for the quarter ended June compared to a year ago.

CapitaRetail China Trust

Distribution per unit (DPU) in the second quarter rose 14.1 per cent from a year earlier to 1.94 cents. Distributable income was $12 million, up 14.2 per cent on-year.

Net property income grew 5.8 per cent on-year. The Reit said it retained $0.8 million of the actual income available for distribution in a move to be prudent. 938LIVE

Frasers Centrepoint Trust

DPU rose 3 per cent on-year to 1.94 cents. The shopping mall trust’s net property income for the quarter grew 4 per cent from a year ago to $14.7 million.

As enhancement works at the Northpoint mall are ending soon, the Reit said it expects the changes to increase Northpoint’s average rent and full-year net property income by 20 per cent and 30 per cent respectively.

First Reit

The healthcare trust’s DPU edged up 0.5 per cent from a year ago to 1.92 cents. Distributable income rose 1.5 per cent to $5.3 million.

The Reit expects private nursing care demand to grow as the Government moves to allow MediSave to be used for palliative care.

Mapletree Logistics Trust

The quarter’s DPU slumped to 1.48 cents, down by over 27 per cent from 2.04 cents in the same period last year. This was “due to additional units arising from the rights issue in Aug 2008″, said the trust.

Distributable income rose about 27 per cent from a year ago to $28.7 million, while net property income jumped 19 per cent to $45.7 million.

Ascott Residence Trust

The serviced apartment Reit’s second-quarter DPU slid 18 per cent from a year ago to 1.79 cents. It said weaker demand in Singapore and China, as well as increased competition from new supply in Beijing and Shanghai, caused total distributable income to fall 17 per cent on-year to $11 million.

Source : Today – 24 Jul 2009

Agents’ ‘greed’ prompts warnings

THE sizzling-hot property market and the rush by buyers to secure choice units have led some property agents to turn greedy.

Some agents are offering potential buyers their services to secure a booking for their choice units if they pay them a commission. This has prompted at least two marketing agencies to warn their agents against this practice.

This scheme is reportedly rampant at the freehold Meadows@Peirce development near Teachers’ Estate, which is supposed to be open for preview only from today.

Some marketing agents, however, told Today that it is the potential buyers that are offering commissions to agents to secure for them their choice units.

The fee earned by these agents is said to be about 1 per cent of the property value. With unit prices at Meadows@Peirce ranging from $900,000 to more than $1 million, these agents could potentially earn between $9,000 and more than $10,000 for each unit that they can secure for an eager buyer.

In an email to its 3,000 associates on Wednesday, ERA Realty Network, one of the marketing agents for the project, warned: “Please do NOT collect commission from buyers for Meadows@Peirce or any other projects. Anyone caught doing so will be terminated from ERA and no commission will be paid to the associates.”

ERA’s associate director Eugene Lim said the email was a “preventive measure”.

“We want to stop it before anyone receives a commission. It is not right,” he added.

Of late, ERA has been cracking the whip on its agents in an industry where complaints of rogue or ignorant agents are rife. Last week, ERA warned its agents against submitting transactions under the names of senior colleagues to garner a higher share of the commissions.

And in February, a couple successfully sued ERA after its agents profited from “flipping” an apartment they were engaged to sell. The couple had sold their apartment through ERA agent Jeremy Ang, but it turned out that the buyer, Ms Natassha Sadiq, was the wife of his boss Mike Parikh, a senior director at ERA. She immediately resold the unit for a $257,000 gain.

Another marketing agent for Meadows@Peirce also issued an email warning a few days ago. Knight Frank reminded its 700 agents that they cannot receive or ask for commission from buyers, cannot collect an entrance fee into the showflat and cannot ask for blank cheques, which can subsequently cause the buyer to feel pressured to make a purchase.

The company’s executive director Foo Suan Peng said: “This is something we don’t condone because it will give rise to conflict of interest.”

Agents Today spoke to said the “fee for secured booking” practice happens with other projects, too. One said there was “nothing wrong” for buyers to pay agents, as both are willing parties.

Singapore Accredited Estate Agencies chief executive Tan Tee Khoon disagrees. He told Today: “The agent receives a commission from buyers when they are already hired by the developer to provide the services. That is unethical.”

Source : Today – 24 Jul 2009